Girls Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Monday, August 15 (click for: Aug 15 Aug 13 Aug 12 Aug 11 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Big Walnut 3 (4 / 0) - Worthington Christian 2 (0 / 1)
  • 8%
  • 71%
  • 55%
  • 25%
  • 62%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 47%
# Games: 41 - 46
O.o.F.: 1-4-2-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Christian   
Carlisle 5 - Xenia 0
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 62%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 61 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carlisle
Results (Winning %)
Xenia   
Centerville-B 4 - Troy 1 (0 / 1)
  • 52%
  • 59%
  • 0%
  • 67%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 53%
# Games: 48 - 42
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Troy   
Central Crossing 4 (1 / 0) - Westland 1 (0 / 2)
  • 75%
  • 48%
  • 92%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 61 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Central Crossing
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Columbus School For Girls 3 (2 / 0) - Olentangy Berlin 2 (1 / 1)
  • 14%
  • 20%
  • 80%
  • 67%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 41 - 35
O.o.F.: 1-5-2-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus School For Girls
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Berlin   
Delaware Hayes 3 (2 / 1) - Hilliard Darby 2 (0 / 2)
  • 43%
  • 40%
  • 59%
  • 54%
  • 63%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 59 - 56
O.o.F.: 5-2-3-1-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Dublin Coffman 3 (1 / 0) - Hathaway Brown 2 (1 / 1)
  • 30%
  • 63%
  • 92%
  • 48%
  • 33%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 50%
# Games: 53 - 53
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Hathaway Brown   
Granville 4 (1 / 0) - Whetstone 1 (0 / 1)
  • 55%
  • 44%
  • 100%
  • 41%
  • 20%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 50%
# Games: 51 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Granville
Results (Winning %)
Whetstone   
Grove City 5 (1 / 0) - Jonathan Alder 0 (0 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Hathaway Brown 3 (1 / 1) - New Albany 2 (0 / 1)
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 43%
  • 92%
  • 43%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 55 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hathaway Brown
Results (Winning %)
New Albany   
Highland 5 (3 / 0) - Olentangy Orange 0 (0 / 1)
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 67%
  • 68%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 74%
# Games: 61 - 21
O.o.F.: 2-5-3-4-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Highland
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Orange   
Kenton Ridge 5 - Sidney 0
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 68%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 61 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kenton Ridge
Results (Winning %)
Sidney   
Lancaster 5 (1 / 1) - Athens 0
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lancaster
Results (Winning %)
Athens   
Mariemont 4 (1 / 0) - Loveland 1 (1 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 48%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 59 - 23
O.o.F.: 1-5-2-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mariemont
Results (Winning %)
Loveland   
North Canton Hoover 4 (6 / 0) - Massillon Jackson 1 (3 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 14%
  • 71%
  • 67%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 52 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Massillon Jackson   
Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin 3 (1 / 0) - Gilmour Academy 2 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 48%
  • 60%
  • 0%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 68%
# Games: 47 - 22
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin
Results (Winning %)
Gilmour Academy   
Perrysburg 5 (5 / 1) - Port Clinton 0
Score: 5-0
% Games:
# Games: 0 - 0
O.o.F.: 4-1-2-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Port Clinton   
Strongsville 5 (1 / 0) - Copley 0 (0 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Strongsville
Results (Winning %)
Copley   
Sycamore 5 (5 / 0) - Bexley 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 45%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 79%
# Games: 57 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
Sycamore 3 (5 / 0) - Turpin 2 (0 / 1)
  • 20%
  • 43%
  • 92%
  • 50%
  • 63%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 56 - 53
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Turpin   
Woodridge 5 (2 / 0) - Our Lady Of The Elms 0 (0 / 1)
  • 71%
  • 59%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 74%
# Games: 61 - 21
O.o.F.: 5-4-1-3-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Woodridge
Results (Winning %)
Our Lady Of The Elms   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: