Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archbishop Alter 3 (5 / 8) - Chaminade-Julienne 2 (4 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 56 - 35 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Archbishop Alter | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Beavercreek 3 (11 / 5) - Springboro 2 (8 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 50% # Games: 49 - 49 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springboro | |||||
| Bexley-B 5 (4 / 2) - Buckeye Valley 0 (3 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Big Walnut 5 (11 / 3) - Westland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 O.o.F.: 2-5-4-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Canal Winchester 4 (7 / 7) - Groveport 1 (0 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 53 - 28 O.o.F.: 2-4-1-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Groveport | |||||
| Chillicothe 5 (10 / 4) - Washington CH 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 53 - 19 O.o.F.: 3-4-1-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chillicothe | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Washington CH | |||||
| Columbus Academy 5 (7 / 6) - Ready 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ready | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (11 / 1) - Mayfield 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 58 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mayfield | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 5 (9 / 5) - Thomas Worthington 0 (6 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 59 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Grandview 5 (6 / 4) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 12) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 O.o.F.: 3-2-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Jonathan Alder 4 (8 / 6) - Shawnee 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 75% # Games: 59 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Shawnee | |||||
| Lake-Uniontown 4 - Canton McKinley 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 26 - 18 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lake-Uniontown | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canton McKinley | |||||
| Lancaster 4 (9 / 4) - Newark 1 (7 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 60 - 40 O.o.F.: 4-3-2-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Newark | |||||
| Legacy Christian Academy 5 - Middletown Christian 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 61 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Legacy Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Middletown Christian | |||||
| Loveland 4 (13 / 2) - Winton Woods 0 | Score: 4-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 48 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Winton Woods | |||||
| Mason 4 (16 / 1) - Lakota East 1 (12 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 54 - 22 O.o.F.: 1-2-5-3-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 4 (13 / 3) - Shaker Heights 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 60 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Shaker Heights | |||||
| North Canton Hoover 5 (12 / 3) - Canton South 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canton South | |||||
| Olentangy 5 (7 / 1) - Westerville Central 0 (3 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 60 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (9 / 2) - Watterson 0 (4 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 64% # Games: 70 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watterson | |||||
| Perrysburg 3 (10 / 1) - Sylvania Southview 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 44 - 37 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Perrysburg | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sylvania Southview | |||||
| Pickerington Central 5 (14 / 1) - Reynoldsburg 0 (6 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 48 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Pickerington North 3 (3 / 5) - DeSales 2 (6 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 67 - 52 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Seven Hills 3 (8 / 2) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 2 (1 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 43 - 42 O.o.F.: 2-1-5-4-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy | |||||
| Sidney 3 - Greenville 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 48 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sidney | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Greenville | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (8 / 6) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hamilton | |||||
| Troy 4 (8 / 3) - Piqua 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 53 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Troy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Piqua | |||||
| University School 4 (8 / 0) - Solon 1 (2 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 59 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
University School | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Solon | |||||
| Upper Arlington 3 (10 / 2) - New Albany 2 (10 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 49 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
New Albany | |||||
| Valley View 3 - Lehman Catholic 2 (2 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 67% # Games: 51 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Valley View | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lehman Catholic | |||||
| Wooster 3 (12 / 2) - Lexington 2 (8 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 46% # Games: 39 - 46 O.o.F.: 3-2-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lexington | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (7 / 5) - Whitehall 0 (1 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whitehall | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 3 (4 / 6) - Westerville South 2 (1 / 11) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 47 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:




























































