Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Beavercreek 3 - Springboro 2 (8 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 42 - 36 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Beavercreek | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Springboro |
Columbus Academy 5 (11 / 1) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Columbus Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Whitehall |
Columbus School For Girls 5 (13 / 0) - Bexley 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Bexley |
Delaware Hayes 4 (5 / 9) - Westerville South 1 (0 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 78% # Games: 57 - 16 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Delaware Hayes | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westerville South |
DeSales 5 (4 / 4) - Hartley 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 67% # Games: 62 - 30 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
DeSales | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hartley |
Dublin Coffman 3 (6 / 4) - Olentangy Orange 2 (3 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 45 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Dublin Coffman | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Olentangy Orange |
Franklin Heights 3 (3 / 7) - Ready 2 (3 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 40 - 36 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Franklin Heights | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Ready |
Greenville 5 (2 / 2) - Fairborn 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Greenville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Fairborn |
Hathaway Brown 3 (5 / 2) - Hawken 2 (4 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 49 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hathaway Brown | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hawken |
Hilliard Davidson 4 (8 / 2) - Hilliard Bradley 1 (4 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 54 - 30 O.o.F.: 4-4-3-1-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hilliard Bradley |
Lancaster 5 (3 / 8) - Logan 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Lancaster | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Logan |
Madison Senior 5 - Dixie 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Madison Senior | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dixie |
Magnificat 3 (7 / 6) - Laurel 2 (2 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 39 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Magnificat | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Laurel |
Marysville 5 (7 / 5) - Dublin Scioto 0 (4 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 68% # Games: 55 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Marysville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dublin Scioto |
Mason 5 (10 / 0) - Lakota West 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Mason | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lakota West |
Massillon Jackson 5 (15 / 0) - Avon 0 (12 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 58 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Massillon Jackson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Avon |
New Albany 5 (9 / 2) - Gahanna 0 (10 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 61 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
New Albany | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Gahanna |
Notre Dame Academy 5 (8 / 5) - Lima Central Catholic 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lima Central Catholic |
Oak Hills 5 (10 / 2) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oak Hills | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Princeton |
Oakwood 5 (8 / 3) - Chaminade-Julienne 0 (10 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oakwood | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Chaminade-Julienne |
Olentangy Berlin 4 (5 / 2) - Thomas Worthington 1 (4 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 49 - 23 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-4-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Thomas Worthington |
Orange 3 (10 / 1) - Gilmour Academy 2 (5 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 56 - 42 O.o.F.: 4-5-2-3-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Orange | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Gilmour Academy |
Pickerington Central 5 (4 / 4) - Newark 0 (9 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 O.o.F.: 1-5-4-2-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Pickerington Central | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Newark |
Reynoldsburg 5 (3 / 9) - Groveport 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Reynoldsburg | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Groveport |
St. Joseph Academy 5 (8 / 6) - Midview 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 59 - 16 O.o.F.: 2-5-1-4-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Midview |
St. Marys Memorial 3 - Lehman Catholic 2 (4 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 46% # Games: 39 - 45 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Marys Memorial | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lehman Catholic |
Sycamore 5 (17 / 0) - Middletown 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Sycamore | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Middletown |
Tippecanoe 5 (8 / 4) - Piqua 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Tippecanoe | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Piqua |
Troy 5 (11 / 2) - West Carrollton 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Troy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
West Carrollton |
Turpin 3 (1 / 2) - Loveland 2 (7 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 50% # Games: 44 - 44 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Turpin | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Loveland |
Valley View 3 - Stivers 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 56 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Valley View | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Stivers |
Western Reserve Academy 3 (6 / 0) - Solon 2 (4 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 51 - 34 O.o.F.: 2-1-5-3-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Solon |
Westerville Central 4 (9 / 1) - Grove City 1 (1 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 58 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Westerville Central | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Grove City |
Westerville North 5 (3 / 2) - Westland 0 (0 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 48 - 1 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Westerville North | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westland |
Wooster 4 (3 / 5) - New Philadelphia 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Wooster | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
New Philadelphia |
Worthington Christian 5 (9 / 3) - Grandview 0 (2 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Worthington Christian | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Grandview |
Worthington Kilbourne 3 (10 / 1) - Big Walnut 2 (8 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 53 - 42 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Big Walnut |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: