Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Walnut 5 (9 / 6) - Westland 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Canal Winchester 5 (10 / 5) - Groveport 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Groveport | |||||
| Columbus Academy 5 (10 / 1) - Franklin Heights 0 (6 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 4 (5 / 7) - Hilliard Bradley 1 (4 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 54 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 5 (12 / 2) - Thomas Worthington 0 (5 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Gahanna 4 (13 / 3) - Pickerington North 1 (4 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 53% # Games: 49 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Grandview 5 (8 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 61 - 13 O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Indian Hill 3 (4 / 4) - Wyoming 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 47 - 29 O.o.F.: 2-4-1-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wyoming | |||||
| Mason 5 (16 / 0) - Sycamore 0 (13 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 60 - 13 O.o.F.: 4-3-5-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sycamore | |||||
| New Albany 3 (12 / 4) - Westerville Central 2 (13 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 52 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Newark 3 (11 / 2) - Lancaster 2 (4 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 51 - 53 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (12 / 3) - Olentangy 0 (3 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 62% # Games: 71 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Olentangy Liberty 4 (3 / 1) - Olentangy Orange 1 (6 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 55% # Games: 47 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Liberty | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Orange | |||||
| St. Joseph Academy 4 (10 / 8) - Avon Lake 1 (0 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 51 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Avon Lake | |||||
| St. Ursula Academy 4 (7 / 5) - Mason-B 0 | Score: 4-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 41 - 21 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mason-B | |||||
| Upper Arlington 5 (9 / 0) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (2 / 9) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Watterson 5 (12 / 2) - DeSales 0 (3 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 61 - 27 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watterson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Westerville North 4 (1 / 5) - Dublin Scioto 1 (4 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 54 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 3 (9 / 4) - Westerville South 2 (1 / 10) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 50 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:















































