Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beachwood 5 (11 / 4) - Hathaway Brown-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 O.o.F.: 1-4-3-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hathaway Brown-B | |||||
| Canal Winchester 3 (10 / 5) - Newark 2 (11 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 46% # Games: 43 - 51 O.o.F.: 3-2-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Newark | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (11 / 2) - Reynoldsburg 0 (3 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 38 - 4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (10 / 5) - Revere 0 (11 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 58 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Revere | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 4 (4 / 8) - Grove City 1 (1 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 60 - 31 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Grove City | |||||
| Gahanna 5 (13 / 3) - Lancaster 0 (4 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 61 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Grandview 5 (8 / 4) - Westland 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 O.o.F.: 1-4-2-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Hilliard Bradley 5 (4 / 5) - Jonathan Alder 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Indian Hill 4 (4 / 4) - Cincinnati Country Day 1 (1 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 48 - 21 O.o.F.: 3-2-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Country Day | |||||
| Mason 4 (16 / 0) - Oak Hills 1 (0 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 81% # Games: 56 - 13 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Oak Hills | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 4 (14 / 1) - Wooster 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 56 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wooster | |||||
| Olentangy 3 (3 / 7) - DeSales 2 (3 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 45 - 38 O.o.F.: 3-5-2-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (12 / 3) - Hilliard Darby 0 (5 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Olentangy Orange 5 (6 / 8) - Pickerington North 0 (4 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 62 - 21 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Ready 5 (4 / 6) - Hamilton Township 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 72% # Games: 59 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ready | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hamilton Township | |||||
| St. Joseph Academy 3 (10 / 8) - Highland 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 48 - 39 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Highland | |||||
| Watterson 4 (12 / 2) - Bexley 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 4-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 48 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watterson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bexley | |||||
| Westerville Central 3 (13 / 1) - Big Walnut 2 (9 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 51 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Big Walnut | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:












































