Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amherst Steele 4 (7 / 4) - Rocky River 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 49 - 27 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Amherst Steele | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Rocky River | |||||
| Avon 5 (8 / 2) - Avon Lake 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 60 - 22 O.o.F.: 5-3-4-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Avon Lake | |||||
| Beachwood 4 (7 / 2) - Shaker Heights 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 56 - 22 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Shaker Heights | |||||
| Bexley 5 (4 / 5) - Grandview 0 (3 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 69 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Grandview | |||||
| Big Walnut 4 (3 / 3) - Delaware Hayes 1 (4 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 60 - 30 O.o.F.: 5-4-1-2-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Centerville 5 (9 / 0) - Springfield 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 O.o.F.: 2-4-5-3-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springfield | |||||
| Columbus Academy 5 (4 / 0) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (6 / 1) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 3 (6 / 0) - Dublin Coffman 2 (2 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 63 - 40 O.o.F.: 3-2-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 5 (2 / 3) - Westerville South 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 61 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Franklin Heights 3 (2 / 4) - Central Crossing 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 41 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Crossing | |||||
| Hawken 4 (5 / 0) - Solon 1 (6 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 56 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hawken | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Solon | |||||
| Hilliard Darby 3 (3 / 2) - Hilliard Bradley 2 (1 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 50% # Games: 51 - 52 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Hudson 3 (1 / 0) - Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 2 (5 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 66% # Games: 50 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hudson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Lancaster 3 (2 / 0) - Teays Valley 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 51 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Teays Valley | |||||
| Loveland 5 (1 / 3) - Winton Woods 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 49 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Winton Woods | |||||
| Magnificat 4 (6 / 1) - Highland 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 53 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Magnificat | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Highland | |||||
| Mason 5 (7 / 0) - Colerain 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Colerain | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 5 (6 / 1) - Copley 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 59 - 9 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Copley | |||||
| New Albany 5 (5 / 3) - Olentangy 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 60 - 27 O.o.F.: 5-4-2-3-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Newark 5 (8 / 0) - Groveport 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 O.o.F.: 3-4-1-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Groveport | |||||
| North Canton Hoover 4 (9 / 2) - St. Joseph Academy 1 (6 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 56 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Northwestern 3 - London 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 46 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Northwestern | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
London | |||||
| Notre Dame Academy 5 (3 / 3) - Ottawa Hills 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ottawa Hills | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (6 / 1) - DeSales 0 (2 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 62 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Pickerington North 5 (3 / 2) - Marysville 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Revere 4 (6 / 2) - Westlake 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 61 - 42 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Revere | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westlake | |||||
| Reynoldsburg 3 (1 / 4) - Canal Winchester 2 (3 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 44 - 43 O.o.F.: 3-5-4-1-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Seven Hills 3 (2 / 2) - Summit Country Day 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 63% # Games: 52 - 31 O.o.F.: 1-5-2-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Summit Country Day | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (5 / 2) - Princeton 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Princeton | |||||
| Turpin 3 (1 / 0) - St. Ursula Academy 2 (5 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 43 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Turpin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (6 / 2) - Ready 0 (3 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ready | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 5 (4 / 1) - Westland 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 48 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:





































































