Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Walnut 4 (1 / 0) - Thomas Worthington 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 59 - 22 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (2 / 0) - Pickerington North 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Grandview 5 (1 / 0) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 61 - 21 O.o.F.: 4-1-2-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Hawken 5 (2 / 0) - Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 67% # Games: 60 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hawken | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Hilliard Darby 5 (1 / 0) - Delaware Hayes 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 61 - 27 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Magnificat 5 (2 / 1) - New Albany 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 60 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Magnificat | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
New Albany | |||||
| Marysville 4 (1 / 0) - Mount Vernon 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 55 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Marysville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mount Vernon | |||||
| Newark 5 (2 / 0) - Cambridge 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 O.o.F.: 5-3-2-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cambridge | |||||
| Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin 3 (1 / 2) - St. Joseph Academy 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 45 - 38 O.o.F.: 4-3-1-5-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Orange 3 (2 / 0) - Beachwood 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 49 - 44 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Ready 3 (1 / 0) - Whitehall 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 45 - 37 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ready | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whitehall | |||||
| St. Ursula Academy 3 (1 / 2) - Ursuline Academy 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 41 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ursuline Academy | |||||
| Westerville Central 5 (2 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 61 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (1 / 0) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 4 (1 / 0) - DeSales 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 55 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:







































