Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Wednesday, May 06 (click for: May 21 May 20 May 19 May 15 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 5 (15 / 1) - Walsh Jesuit 0 (0 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 89%
# Games: 48 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Walsh Jesuit   
Beavercreek 5 (14 / 6) - Springfield 0
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 57%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 75%
# Games: 61 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Springfield   
Beechcroft 3 (1 / 2) - Ready 2 (7 / 9)
  • 43%
  • 33%
  • 80%
  • 57%
  • 92%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 53 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beechcroft
Results (Winning %)
Ready   
Bexley-B 5 (5 / 2) - Jonathan Alder 0 (9 / 7)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley-B
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Carroll 3 (3 / 10) - Stivers 2
  • 25%
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 25%
  • 57%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 48 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carroll
Results (Winning %)
Stivers   
Centerville-B 3 (10 / 3) - Beavercreek-B 2
  • 62%
  • 43%
  • 50%
  • 80%
  • 64%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 64 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Beavercreek-B   
Dublin Jerome 4 (11 / 2) - Dublin Coffman 1 (6 / 5)
  • 63%
  • 55%
  • 71%
  • 65%
  • 64%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 72 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Coffman   
Gahanna 5 (15 / 4) - Westland 0
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Grandview 3 (9 / 4) - Big Walnut 2 (13 / 5)
  • 67%
  • 29%
  • 58%
  • 65%
  • 28%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 57 - 53
O.o.F.: 2-1-4-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grandview
Results (Winning %)
Big Walnut   
Granville 3 (4 / 0) - Lancaster 2 (12 / 5)
  • 33%
  • 75%
  • 59%
  • 53%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 61 - 47
O.o.F.: 5-2-4-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Granville
Results (Winning %)
Lancaster   
Greenville 3 - Northwestern 2 (9 / 4)
  • 0%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 29%
  • 63%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 41 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Greenville
Results (Winning %)
Northwestern   
Grove City 4 (10 / 3) - Dublin Scioto 1 (9 / 7)
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 29%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 53 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Hamilton Township 5 (2 / 0) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 15)
  • 63%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 44%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 55 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hamilton Township
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Hilliard Darby 4 (3 / 10) - Buckeye Valley 1 (3 / 11)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 41%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 48 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Darby
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Kettering Fairmont 5 (14 / 6) - Trotwood-Madison 0
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 49 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Trotwood-Madison   
Lehman Catholic 3 (4 / 8) - Troy 2 (10 / 4)
  • 8%
  • 57%
  • 0%
  • 57%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 46%
# Games: 46 - 53
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lehman Catholic
Results (Winning %)
Troy   
Massillon Jackson 4 (15 / 4) - St. Edward 1 (1 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 68%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 51 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
St. Edward   
Milton-Union 4 - Chaminade-Julienne 1 (6 / 10)
  • 100%
  • 48%
  • 80%
  • 57%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 62 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Milton-Union
Results (Winning %)
Chaminade-Julienne   
New Albany 5 (14 / 3) - Watkins Memorial 0 (12 / 5)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Watkins Memorial   
Newark 4 (11 / 5) - Reynoldsburg 1 (8 / 7)
  • 14%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 58%
  • 58%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 54 - 38
O.o.F.: 3-1-2-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
North Canton Hoover 3 (14 / 4) - Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 2 (12 / 3)
  • 57%
  • 86%
  • 53%
  • 46%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 68 - 60
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy   
Olentangy Berlin 3 (12 / 4) - Pickerington Central 2 (16 / 4)
  • 20%
  • 0%
  • 100%
  • 60%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 39 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington Central   
Orange 4 (9 / 2) - Bexley 1 (10 / 10)
  • 67%
  • 67%
  • 41%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 57 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Orange
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
St. Charles 3 (5 / 7) - Wellington 2 (0 / 3)
  • 42%
  • 67%
  • 60%
  • 37%
  • 54%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 52 - 48
O.o.F.: 4-3-2-1-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Charles
Results (Winning %)
Wellington   
University School 4 (12 / 1) - Shaker Heights 1 (0 / 4)
  • 59%
  • 35%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 56 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
University School
Results (Winning %)
Shaker Heights   
Upper Arlington 3 (11 / 3) - Olentangy 2 (8 / 5)
  • 62%
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 71%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 49 - 45
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy   
Watterson 3 (5 / 4) - Delaware Hayes 2 (11 / 7)
  • 8%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 20%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 40 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watterson
Results (Winning %)
Delaware Hayes   
Westerville Central 5 (6 / 9) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 48 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville Central
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Wooster 4 (15 / 5) - North Royalton 1 (0 / 3)
  • 65%
  • 100%
  • 43%
  • 65%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 60 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
North Royalton   
Worthington Christian 4 (12 / 6) - Thomas Worthington 1 (6 / 10)
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 20%
  • 86%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 51 - 26
O.o.F.: 4-3-2-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Worthington Kilbourne 3 (6 / 9) - Mount Vernon 2 (0 / 7)
  • 67%
  • 25%
  • 41%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 49 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: