Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Monday, April 27 (click for: Apr 28 Apr 27 Apr 25 Apr 24 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Brunswick 3 (1 / 1) - Copley 2 (4 / 3)
  • 0%
  • 80%
  • 43%
  • 62%
  • 65%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 48 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Brunswick
Results (Winning %)
Copley   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (11 / 1) - Hudson 1 (0 / 2)
  • 0%
  • 75%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 48 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Hudson   
DeSales 5 (6 / 4) - Westerville North 0 (2 / 7)
  • 72%
  • 50%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 59 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Westerville North   
Dublin Coffman 3 (5 / 4) - Bexley 2 (8 / 8)
  • 25%
  • 71%
  • 59%
  • 14%
  • 58%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 48%
# Games: 42 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
Grandview 3 (6 / 4) - Bloom-Carroll 1 (1 / 1)
  • 57%
  • 36%
  • 86%
  • 75%
Score: 3-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 45 - 30
O.o.F.: 3-4-1-0-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grandview
Results (Winning %)
Bloom-Carroll   
Grove City 5 (6 / 3) - Jonathan Alder 0 (8 / 6)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Hilliard Darby 3 (1 / 8) - Ready 2 (6 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 41%
  • 92%
  • 55%
  • 100%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 69%
# Games: 61 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Darby
Results (Winning %)
Ready   
Kettering Fairmont 3 (11 / 6) - Fairborn 0
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 75%
Score: 3-0
% Games: 84%
# Games: 36 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Fairborn   
Lake-Uniontown 5 - Massillon Perry 0
  • 71%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lake-Uniontown
Results (Winning %)
Massillon Perry   
Lakota East 5 (12 / 4) - Middletown 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
O.o.F.: 2-1-3-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Middletown   
Legacy Christian Academy 5 - Middletown Christian 0
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Legacy Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Middletown Christian   
Massillon Jackson 5 (13 / 3) - Green 0 (0 / 3)
  • 71%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Green   
Moeller 3 (12 / 5) - Kings 1 (0 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 68%
  • 80%
  • 33%
Score: 3-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 43 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Moeller
Results (Winning %)
Kings   
Newark 3 (7 / 5) - Fisher Catholic 2 (0 / 1)
  • 41%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 42%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 64%
# Games: 53 - 30
O.o.F.: 3-4-2-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Fisher Catholic   
North Canton Hoover 4 (12 / 3) - Canton McKinley 1
  • 8%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 49 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Canton McKinley   
Olentangy 3 (7 / 1) - Dublin Scioto 2 (5 / 6)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 45%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 64%
# Games: 54 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Olentangy Berlin 3 (9 / 2) - Gahanna 2 (10 / 4)
  • 67%
  • 29%
  • 92%
  • 41%
  • 55%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 49 - 41
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Gahanna   
Olentangy Orange 5 (11 / 2) - Columbus Academy 0 (7 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 57%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 60 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Columbus Academy   
Perrysburg 4 (10 / 1) - Findlay 1 (0 / 3)
  • 8%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 63%
  • 68%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 50 - 31
O.o.F.: 3-1-2-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Findlay   
Pickerington Central 4 (14 / 1) - Watterson 1 (4 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 62%
  • 67%
  • 37%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 56 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Watterson   
Piqua 4 - Wayne 0
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 4-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 48 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Piqua
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
Seven Hills 5 (8 / 2) - Wyoming 0 (0 / 3)
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 56%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 66%
# Games: 33 - 17
O.o.F.: 1-0-0-2-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Wyoming   
Upper Arlington-B 4 (1 / 1) - St. Charles 1 (2 / 5)
  • 37%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 55 - 25
O.o.F.: 3-5-4-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington-B
Results (Winning %)
St. Charles   
Watkins Memorial 3 (10 / 3) - Big Walnut 2 (11 / 3)
  • 72%
  • 80%
  • 25%
  • 52%
  • 33%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 52 - 48
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Big Walnut   
Westerville Central 5 (3 / 7) - Westerville South 0 (1 / 11)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville Central
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Worthington Kilbourne 4 (4 / 6) - Thomas Worthington 1 (6 / 6)
  • 65%
  • 75%
  • 28%
  • 62%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 64 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: