Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Wednesday, April 08 (click for: Apr 08 Apr 07 Apr 06 Apr 03 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 3 (5 / 0) - Westlake 2 (0 / 2)
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 38%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 61%
# Games: 51 - 33
O.o.F.: 2-3-5-4-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Westlake   
Beavercreek 4 (5 / 1) - Oakwood 1 (2 / 1)
  • 58%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 25%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 54 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Oakwood   
Bexley 5 (5 / 1) - Olentangy Liberty 0 (1 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 57%
  • 80%
  • 59%
  • 59%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 66%
# Games: 63 - 32
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Liberty   
Big Walnut 4 (3 / 0) - Westerville Central 1 (0 / 2)
  • 32%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 54 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Centerville 3 (3 / 1) - Bellbrook 2 (2 / 2)
  • 42%
  • 58%
  • 0%
  • 80%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 50 - 47
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Bellbrook   
Centerville-B 4 (2 / 1) - Little Miami 1 (0 / 2)
  • 53%
  • 20%
  • 92%
  • 59%
  • 72%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 49 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Little Miami   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (2 / 0) - Beachwood 1 (0 / 2)
  • 62%
  • 33%
  • 80%
  • 72%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 56 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Beachwood   
Delaware Hayes 3 (3 / 1) - Chillicothe 2 (4 / 1)
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 72%
  • 75%
  • 72%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 45 - 38
O.o.F.: 4-2-5-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Chillicothe   
DeSales 3 (2 / 1) - Worthington Christian 2 (1 / 2)
  • 29%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 20%
  • 57%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 45 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Christian   
Grove City 5 (1 / 1) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Hilliard Bradley 3 (1 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 2 (2 / 2)
  • 32%
  • 52%
  • 67%
  • 45%
  • 40%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 47%
# Games: 53 - 60
O.o.F.: 5-1-3-2-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Bradley
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Indian Hill 3 (1 / 0) - Mason 2 (2 / 1)
  • 63%
  • 92%
  • 14%
  • 62%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 46 - 40
O.o.F.: 2-3-5-4-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Indian Hill
Results (Winning %)
Mason   
Kettering Fairmont 3 (4 / 1) - Miami Valley School 2 (1 / 4)
  • 33%
  • 50%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 57 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Miami Valley School   
Loveland 4 (3 / 0) - Oak Hills 1 (0 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 47%
  • 75%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 77%
# Games: 57 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Oak Hills   
Marysville 5 (1 / 2) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Marysville
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Massillon Jackson 4 (3 / 1) - Lake-Uniontown 1
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 68%
  • 80%
  • 45%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 73%
# Games: 58 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Lake-Uniontown   
Milton-Union 5 - Greenville 0
  • 59%
  • 57%
  • 59%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 62%
# Games: 46 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Milton-Union
Results (Winning %)
Greenville   
New Albany 3 (2 / 0) - Dublin Jerome 2 (2 / 1)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 63%
  • 38%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 51 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Jerome   
Newark 3 (3 / 1) - Zanesville 2
  • 33%
  • 35%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 50 - 35
O.o.F.: 3-4-2-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Zanesville   
North Canton Hoover 4 (4 / 2) - Green 1 (0 / 1)
  • 25%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 78%
# Games: 52 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Green   
Olentangy Berlin 5 (2 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 2)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 97%
# Games: 60 - 2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Pickerington Central 4 (3 / 1) - St. Charles 1 (1 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 46%
  • 92%
  • 59%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 61 - 26
O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
St. Charles   
Sidney 3 - Bellefontaine 2 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 47%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 61%
# Games: 60 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Bellefontaine   
Springboro 3 (3 / 0) - Sycamore 2 (1 / 2)
  • 29%
  • 52%
  • 0%
  • 75%
  • 58%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 47%
# Games: 45 - 51
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Sycamore   
Springfield 5 - Piqua 0
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 65%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 61 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springfield
Results (Winning %)
Piqua   
Thomas Worthington 5 (1 / 2) - Canal Winchester 0 (2 / 3)
  • 71%
  • 62%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 61 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Thomas Worthington
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Troy 5 (2 / 1) - Wayne 0
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 48 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
Upper Arlington 5 (6 / 0) - Columbus Academy 0 (1 / 1)
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 65%
  • 75%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 61 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Columbus Academy   
Valley View-B 4 - Greeneview 1
  • 38%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 79%
# Games: 56 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View-B
Results (Winning %)
Greeneview   
Watkins Memorial 3 (4 / 2) - Pickerington North 2 (0 / 2)
  • 20%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 45%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 62%
# Games: 48 - 29
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington North   
Westland 3 - Ready 2 (2 / 2)
  • 61%
  • 68%
  • 44%
  • 57%
  • 32%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 60 - 54
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westland
Results (Winning %)
Ready   
Wooster 5 (5 / 0) - Medina 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
Medina   
Worthington Kilbourne 4 (2 / 0) - Hilliard Darby 1 (0 / 2)
  • 14%
  • 62%
  • 50%
  • 48%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 50%
# Games: 58 - 58
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: