Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 3 (5 / 0) - Westlake 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 51 - 33 O.o.F.: 2-3-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westlake | |||||
| Beavercreek 4 (5 / 1) - Oakwood 1 (2 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 54 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Oakwood | |||||
| Bexley 5 (5 / 1) - Olentangy Liberty 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 63 - 32 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Liberty | |||||
| Big Walnut 4 (3 / 0) - Westerville Central 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 54 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Centerville 3 (3 / 1) - Bellbrook 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 50 - 47 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bellbrook | |||||
| Centerville-B 4 (2 / 1) - Little Miami 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 49 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Little Miami | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (2 / 0) - Beachwood 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 56 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 3 (3 / 1) - Chillicothe 2 (4 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 45 - 38 O.o.F.: 4-2-5-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chillicothe | |||||
| DeSales 3 (2 / 1) - Worthington Christian 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 45 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Grove City 5 (1 / 1) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grove City | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Hilliard Bradley 3 (1 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 53 - 60 O.o.F.: 5-1-3-2-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Indian Hill 3 (1 / 0) - Mason 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 46 - 40 O.o.F.: 2-3-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mason | |||||
| Kettering Fairmont 3 (4 / 1) - Miami Valley School 2 (1 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 57 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miami Valley School | |||||
| Loveland 4 (3 / 0) - Oak Hills 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 77% # Games: 57 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Oak Hills | |||||
| Marysville 5 (1 / 2) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Marysville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 4 (3 / 1) - Lake-Uniontown 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 58 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lake-Uniontown | |||||
| Milton-Union 5 - Greenville 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 62% # Games: 46 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Milton-Union | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Greenville | |||||
| New Albany 3 (2 / 0) - Dublin Jerome 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 51 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Newark 3 (3 / 1) - Zanesville 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 50 - 35 O.o.F.: 3-4-2-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Zanesville | |||||
| North Canton Hoover 4 (4 / 2) - Green 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 78% # Games: 52 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Green | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (2 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Pickerington Central 4 (3 / 1) - St. Charles 1 (1 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 61 - 26 O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Charles | |||||
| Sidney 3 - Bellefontaine 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 60 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sidney | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bellefontaine | |||||
| Springboro 3 (3 / 0) - Sycamore 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 45 - 51 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Springboro | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Springfield 5 - Piqua 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 61 - 13 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Springfield | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Piqua | |||||
| Thomas Worthington 5 (1 / 2) - Canal Winchester 0 (2 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 61 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Troy 5 (2 / 1) - Wayne 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 48 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Troy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wayne | |||||
| Upper Arlington 5 (6 / 0) - Columbus Academy 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Valley View-B 4 - Greeneview 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 79% # Games: 56 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Valley View-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Greeneview | |||||
| Watkins Memorial 3 (4 / 2) - Pickerington North 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 48 - 29 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Westland 3 - Ready 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 60 - 54 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ready | |||||
| Wooster 5 (5 / 0) - Medina 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Medina | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 4 (2 / 0) - Hilliard Darby 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 50% # Games: 58 - 58 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:




























































