Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Tuesday, April 07 (click for: Apr 08 Apr 07 Apr 06 Apr 03 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 3 (5 / 0) - Highland 2 (0 / 1)
  • 59%
  • 50%
  • 75%
  • 55%
  • 0%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 57%
# Games: 54 - 40
O.o.F.: 5-3-1-2-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Highland   
Beavercreek 5 (5 / 1) - Northmont 0
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Bexley 5 (5 / 1) - Grandview 0 (1 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Grandview   
Big Walnut 5 (3 / 0) - Delaware Hayes 0 (3 / 1)
  • 59%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 70%
  • 58%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 68 - 29
O.o.F.: 3-2-4-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Delaware Hayes   
Buckeye Valley 4 (1 / 2) - Franklin Heights 1 (0 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 86%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 50 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Buckeye Valley
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Butler 3 - Fairborn 2
  • 0%
  • 14%
  • 100%
  • 65%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 39 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Butler
Results (Winning %)
Fairborn   
Carlisle 5 - Brookville 0
  • 67%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 50%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 68%
# Games: 63 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carlisle
Results (Winning %)
Brookville   
Centerville 5 (3 / 1) - Springfield 0
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Springfield   
Centerville-B 4 (2 / 1) - Tippecanoe-B 1
  • 56%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 68%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 59 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Tippecanoe-B   
Chillicothe 5 (4 / 1) - Hillsboro 0
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
O.o.F.: 5-1-4-2-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Hillsboro   
Colerain 4 (1 / 0) - Hamilton 1 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 83%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 0%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 41 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Colerain
Results (Winning %)
Hamilton   
Columbus Academy 5 (1 / 1) - Worthington Christian 0 (1 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Christian   
Dayton Christian 5 - Eaton 0
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Eaton   
Dublin Jerome 5 (2 / 1) - Marysville 0 (1 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Marysville   
Dublin Scioto 5 (2 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 2)
  • 54%
  • 86%
  • 63%
  • 86%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 61 - 23
O.o.F.: 5-2-4-3-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Scioto
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Gahanna 5 (5 / 0) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 96%
# Games: 48 - 2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Hawken 5 (2 / 1) - Western Reserve Academy 0
  • 100%
  • 63%
  • 52%
  • 57%
  • 52%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 61%
# Games: 62 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hawken
Results (Winning %)
Western Reserve Academy   
Jonathan Alder 4 (2 / 2) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 2)
  • 63%
  • 80%
  • 52%
  • 71%
  • 50%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 69 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
Kenton Ridge   
Lexington 5 (3 / 2) - Madison Comprehensive 0
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
O.o.F.: 3-2-4-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
Madison Comprehensive   
Loveland 4 (3 / 0) - Little Miami 1 (0 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 32%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 54 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Little Miami   
Mason 5 (2 / 1) - Princeton 0 (0 / 1)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Princeton   
Miamisburg 5 (1 / 2) - Wayne 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miamisburg
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
New Albany 5 (2 / 0) - Grove City 0 (1 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 56%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 58 - 12
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Grove City   
Newark 5 (3 / 1) - Groveport 0 (0 / 1)
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
O.o.F.: 3-4-5-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Groveport   
Northwestern 3 (2 / 0) - London 2 (1 / 1)
  • 86%
  • 65%
  • 86%
  • 20%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 49 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
London   
Oakwood 3 (2 / 1) - Miami Valley School 2 (1 / 4)
  • 52%
  • 45%
  • 41%
  • 80%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 63 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Miami Valley School   
Olentangy 5 (1 / 0) - Thomas Worthington 0 (1 / 2)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 65%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 61 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Olentangy Berlin 4 (2 / 0) - Hilliard Darby 1 (0 / 2)
  • 33%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 78%
# Games: 54 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Olentangy Liberty 4 (1 / 1) - Dublin Coffman 1 (0 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 64%
  • 20%
  • 56%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 61%
# Games: 60 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Liberty
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Coffman   
Olentangy Orange 5 (2 / 0) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Davidson   
Pickerington Central 5 (3 / 1) - Logan 0
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 97%
# Games: 60 - 2
O.o.F.: 2-5-1-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Logan   
Piqua 4 - West Carrollton 1
  • 28%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 53 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Piqua
Results (Winning %)
West Carrollton   
Ready 5 (2 / 2) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 1)
  • 65%
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 61 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ready
Results (Winning %)
Whitehall   
Reynoldsburg 4 (1 / 2) - Canal Winchester 1 (2 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 29%
  • 59%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 54 - 25
O.o.F.: 2-1-5-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Reynoldsburg
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Seven Hills 3 (2 / 0) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 2 (1 / 1)
  • 8%
  • 92%
  • 57%
  • 25%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 42 - 37
O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy   
Sidney 4 - Stebbins 1
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 55%
  • 20%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 51 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Stebbins   
Springboro 5 (3 / 0) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (4 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Kettering Fairmont   
Sycamore 5 (1 / 2) - Oak Hills 0 (0 / 2)
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Oak Hills   
Troy 3 (2 / 1) - Greenville 2
  • 92%
  • 25%
  • 62%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 38 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Greenville   
Upper Arlington 5 (6 / 0) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (1 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Bradley   
Valley View 3 - Milton-Union 2
  • 92%
  • 63%
  • 14%
  • 20%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 41 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
Milton-Union   
Wooster 5 (5 / 0) - West Holmes 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
West Holmes   
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (2 / 0) - Westland 0
  • 100%
  • 88%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 62 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Westland   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: