Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beavercreek 3 (5 / 1) - Bellbrook 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 50 - 55 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bellbrook | |||||
| Big Walnut 5 (3 / 0) - Mount Vernon 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mount Vernon | |||||
| Canal Winchester 4 (2 / 3) - Franklin Heights 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 54 - 24 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Carlisle 5 - Franklin 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 36 - 5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Carlisle | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin | |||||
| Centerville 5 (3 / 1) - Miami Valley School 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miami Valley School | |||||
| Chillicothe 3 (4 / 1) - Teays Valley 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 58 - 43 O.o.F.: 1-3-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chillicothe | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Teays Valley | |||||
| Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 4 (1 / 1) - Chaminade-Julienne 1 (1 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 42 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 4 (3 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 1 (2 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 55 - 23 O.o.F.: 1-4-3-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 3 (2 / 0) - Westerville Central 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 51 - 44 O.o.F.: 5-4-1-2-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Gahanna 4 (5 / 0) - Westerville North 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 54 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Hawken 4 (2 / 1) - Beachwood 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 75% # Games: 56 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hawken | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Kettering Fairmont 4 (4 / 1) - Butler 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 52 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Butler | |||||
| Lakota West 3 (1 / 1) - Centerville-B 2 (2 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 52 - 41 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lakota West | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Centerville-B | |||||
| Lexington 5 (3 / 2) - Ashland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 61 - 19 O.o.F.: 2-3-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lexington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ashland | |||||
| London 5 (1 / 1) - West Jefferson 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
London | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
West Jefferson | |||||
| Loveland 4 (3 / 0) - Milford 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 50 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Milford | |||||
| Mason 5 (2 / 1) - Walnut Hills 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Walnut Hills | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 5 (3 / 1) - North Canton Hoover 0 (4 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Northwestern 3 (2 / 0) - Northmont 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 48 - 31 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Northwestern | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Northmont | |||||
| Oakwood 4 (2 / 1) - Milton-Union 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 54 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Oakwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Milton-Union | |||||
| Pickerington Central 3 (3 / 1) - Pickerington North 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 58 - 39 O.o.F.: 2-5-1-3-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Sidney 3 - Celina 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 63% # Games: 47 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sidney | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Celina | |||||
| Springboro 3 (3 / 0) - Tippecanoe 2 (1 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 41 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Springboro | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Tippecanoe | |||||
| Valley View 3 - McNicholas 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 44 - 41 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Valley View | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
McNicholas | |||||
| Watkins Memorial 5 (4 / 2) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 61 - 14 O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Wilmington 4 (1 / 0) - Valley View-B 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 63 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wilmington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Valley View-B | |||||
| Worthington Christian 3 (1 / 2) - Wellington 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 56 - 48 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wellington | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:















































