Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Monday, April 06 (click for: Apr 08 Apr 07 Apr 06 Apr 03 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Beavercreek 3 (5 / 1) - Bellbrook 2 (2 / 2)
  • 57%
  • 32%
  • 14%
  • 55%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 48%
# Games: 50 - 55
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Bellbrook   
Big Walnut 5 (3 / 0) - Mount Vernon 0 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 60 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   
Canal Winchester 4 (2 / 3) - Franklin Heights 1 (0 / 3)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 32%
  • 80%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 54 - 24
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Canal Winchester
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Carlisle 5 - Franklin 0
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 36 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carlisle
Results (Winning %)
Franklin   
Centerville 5 (3 / 1) - Miami Valley School 0 (1 / 4)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Miami Valley School   
Chillicothe 3 (4 / 1) - Teays Valley 2 (0 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 45%
  • 63%
  • 41%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 57%
# Games: 58 - 43
O.o.F.: 1-3-3-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Teays Valley   
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 4 (1 / 1) - Chaminade-Julienne 1 (1 / 3)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 33%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 42 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Chaminade-Julienne   
Delaware Hayes 4 (3 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 1 (2 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 37%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 63%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 55 - 23
O.o.F.: 1-4-3-2-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Dublin Scioto 3 (2 / 0) - Westerville Central 2 (0 / 2)
  • 29%
  • 65%
  • 62%
  • 71%
  • 40%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 51 - 44
O.o.F.: 5-4-1-2-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Scioto
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Gahanna 4 (5 / 0) - Westerville North 1 (0 / 1)
  • 32%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 73%
# Games: 54 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Westerville North   
Hawken 4 (2 / 1) - Beachwood 1 (0 / 2)
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 38%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 75%
# Games: 56 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hawken
Results (Winning %)
Beachwood   
Kettering Fairmont 4 (4 / 1) - Butler 1
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 60%
  • 63%
  • 25%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 52 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Butler   
Lakota West 3 (1 / 1) - Centerville-B 2 (2 / 1)
  • 42%
  • 29%
  • 92%
  • 62%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 52 - 41
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota West
Results (Winning %)
Centerville-B   
Lexington 5 (3 / 2) - Ashland 0
  • 65%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 63%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 61 - 19
O.o.F.: 2-3-4-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
Ashland   
London 5 (1 / 1) - West Jefferson 0
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 81%
# Games: 60 - 14
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
London
Results (Winning %)
West Jefferson   
Loveland 4 (3 / 0) - Milford 1 (0 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 53%
  • 25%
  • 92%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 50 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Milford   
Mason 5 (2 / 1) - Walnut Hills 0 (1 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Walnut Hills   
Massillon Jackson 5 (3 / 1) - North Canton Hoover 0 (4 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
North Canton Hoover   
Northwestern 3 (2 / 0) - Northmont 2
  • 86%
  • 42%
  • 86%
  • 25%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 61%
# Games: 48 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Oakwood 4 (2 / 1) - Milton-Union 1
  • 40%
  • 80%
  • 68%
  • 92%
  • 45%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 54 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Milton-Union   
Pickerington Central 3 (3 / 1) - Pickerington North 2 (0 / 2)
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 41%
  • 46%
  • 72%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 60%
# Games: 58 - 39
O.o.F.: 2-5-1-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington North   
Sidney 3 - Celina 2
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 37%
  • 25%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 47 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Celina   
Springboro 3 (3 / 0) - Tippecanoe 2 (1 / 3)
  • 29%
  • 75%
  • 0%
  • 86%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 41 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Tippecanoe   
Valley View 3 - McNicholas 2 (0 / 1)
  • 65%
  • 28%
  • 14%
  • 63%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 44 - 41
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
McNicholas   
Watkins Memorial 5 (4 / 2) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 2)
  • 59%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 81%
# Games: 61 - 14
O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
Wilmington 4 (1 / 0) - Valley View-B 1
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 65%
  • 59%
  • 41%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 63 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wilmington
Results (Winning %)
Valley View-B   
Worthington Christian 3 (1 / 2) - Wellington 2 (0 / 1)
  • 59%
  • 60%
  • 33%
  • 80%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 56 - 48
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Wellington   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: