Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 4 (5 / 0) - Lake-Uniontown 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 59 - 27 O.o.F.: 2-1-3-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lake-Uniontown | |||||
| Bexley 4 (5 / 1) - Watkins Memorial 1 (4 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 74% # Games: 50 - 18 O.o.F.: 4-5-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Gahanna 4 (5 / 0) - Lancaster 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 59 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Grandview 3 (1 / 1) - Centennial 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 51 - 31 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Centennial | |||||
| Kettering Fairmont 5 (4 / 1) - Miamisburg 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 60 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miamisburg | |||||
| Lexington 5 (3 / 2) - New Philadelphia 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lexington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
New Philadelphia | |||||
| Mason-B 3 (1 / 0) - Lakota East 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 49 - 40 O.o.F.: 5-3-2-1-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Solon 4 (2 / 0) - Strongsville 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 56 - 31 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Solon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Strongsville | |||||
| St. Johns Jesuit 5 (2 / 0) - Sylvania Northview 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Johns Jesuit | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sylvania Northview | |||||
| University School 5 (1 / 0) - Westlake 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 65 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
University School | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westlake | |||||
| Wooster 4 (5 / 0) - North Canton Hoover 1 (4 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 54 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:



























