Girls Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Thursday, September 18 (click for: Sep 19 Sep 18 Sep 17 Sep 16 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Bellbrook 4 (13 / 6) - Miamisburg 1 (5 / 7)
  • 0%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 48 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
Big Walnut 5 (12 / 4) - Westland 0 (0 / 8)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Canal Winchester 5 (10 / 9) - Groveport 0 (0 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
O.o.F.: 1-3-2-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Canal Winchester
Results (Winning %)
Groveport   
Chaminade-Julienne 5 (13 / 3) - Carroll 0 (2 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 59%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 84%
# Games: 61 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Carroll   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (12 / 4) - Copley 1 (0 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 50%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 45%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 55 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Copley   
Dublin Coffman 5 (8 / 6) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 7)
  • 50%
  • 86%
  • 65%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 72%
# Games: 59 - 23
O.o.F.: 2-5-4-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Bradley   
Dublin Jerome 5 (6 / 5) - Thomas Worthington 0 (5 / 10)
  • 92%
  • 60%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 62%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 75%
# Games: 61 - 20
O.o.F.: 3-1-4-5-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Eaton 4 (14 / 2) - Valley View 1
  • 75%
  • 72%
  • 71%
  • 41%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 58 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Eaton
Results (Winning %)
Valley View   
Franklin 4 (10 / 4) - West Carrollton 1
  • 25%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 52 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Franklin
Results (Winning %)
West Carrollton   
Gilmour Academy 3 (9 / 1) - Magnificat 2 (11 / 7)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 0%
  • 57%
  • 25%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 41 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gilmour Academy
Results (Winning %)
Magnificat   
Kettering Fairmont 5 (6 / 9) - Stivers 0
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 59%
  • 86%
  • 55%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 60 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Stivers   
Marysville 4 (10 / 7) - Hilliard Darby 1 (8 / 6)
  • 60%
  • 50%
  • 20%
  • 80%
  • 60%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 54%
# Games: 54 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Marysville
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Mason 5 (16 / 0) - Sycamore 0 (19 / 2)
  • 68%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 75%
# Games: 61 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Sycamore   
Mason-B 3 - Loveland 2 (8 / 10)
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 29%
  • 80%
  • 33%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 47 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason-B
Results (Winning %)
Loveland   
New Albany 4 (13 / 3) - Westerville Central 1 (11 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 29%
  • 100%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 53 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Newark 4 (14 / 2) - Lancaster 1 (5 / 11)
  • 33%
  • 53%
  • 65%
  • 67%
  • 60%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 66 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Lancaster   
North Canton Hoover 4 (18 / 4) - Archbishop Hoban 1 (0 / 2)
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 33%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 54 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Hoban   
Olentangy Berlin 4 (7 / 5) - Olentangy 1 (2 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 44%
  • 56%
  • 51%
  • 55%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 75 - 60
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy   
Pickerington Central 5 (5 / 4) - Reynoldsburg 0 (4 / 13)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
St. Ursula Academy 4 (11 / 4) - Seven Hills 1 (5 / 7)
  • 92%
  • 29%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 75%
# Games: 53 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Ursula Academy
Results (Winning %)
Seven Hills   
Troy 3 (16 / 3) - Greenville 2 (5 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 25%
  • 8%
  • 59%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 42 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Greenville   
Upper Arlington 5 (12 / 1) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (10 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 60%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 57 - 14
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Davidson   
Western Reserve Academy 5 (12 / 0) - Wooster 0 (6 / 7)
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
O.o.F.: 1-4-5-3-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Western Reserve Academy
Results (Winning %)
Wooster   
Westerville North 3 (6 / 5) - Dublin Scioto 2 (6 / 9)
  • 71%
  • 54%
  • 60%
  • 37%
  • 48%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 59 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville North
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (13 / 2) - Westerville South 0 (1 / 9)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 54%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 62 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Zanesville 4 - Franklin Heights 1 (4 / 10)
  • 62%
  • 52%
  • 75%
  • 25%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 53 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Zanesville
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: