Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Bath 4 - Lehman Catholic 1 (4 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 70 - 49 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Bath | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lehman Catholic |
Bellbrook 4 (13 / 6) - Milton-Union 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Bellbrook | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Milton-Union |
Big Walnut 4 (12 / 4) - Dublin Scioto 1 (6 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 50 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Big Walnut | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dublin Scioto |
Canal Winchester 3 (10 / 9) - Lancaster 2 (5 / 11) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 52 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Canal Winchester | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lancaster |
Centerville 4 (13 / 6) - Beavercreek 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 54 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Centerville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Beavercreek |
Centerville-B 5 - Beavercreek-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Centerville-B | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Beavercreek-B |
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 3 (2 / 1) - Seven Hills 2 (5 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 52 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Seven Hills |
Columbus School For Girls 5 (16 / 1) - Watterson 0 (4 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 61 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Watterson |
Delaware Hayes 5 (6 / 10) - Westland 0 (0 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Delaware Hayes | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westland |
Eaton 3 (14 / 2) - Madison Senior 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 46 - 34 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Eaton | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Madison Senior |
Gahanna 5 (13 / 2) - Grove City 0 (1 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Gahanna | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Grove City |
Gilmour Academy 4 (9 / 1) - Maumee Valley Country Day 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 54 - 30 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Gilmour Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Maumee Valley Country Day |
Greenville 4 (5 / 4) - Sidney 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 49 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Greenville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Sidney |
Hilliard Davidson 3 (10 / 4) - Olentangy Liberty 2 (0 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 54 - 48 O.o.F.: 3-4-5-2-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Olentangy Liberty |
Hudson 4 (4 / 3) - Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 1 (12 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 57 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hudson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy |
Jonathan Alder 4 (4 / 3) - Ready 1 (3 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 52 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Jonathan Alder | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Ready |
Kenton Ridge 5 - Urbana 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 61 - 14 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Kenton Ridge | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Urbana |
Kettering Fairmont 4 (6 / 9) - Springfield 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 61% # Games: 51 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Springfield |
Loveland 4 (8 / 10) - Milford 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 56 - 35 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Loveland | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Milford |
Magnificat 3 (11 / 7) - Highland 2 (1 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 67% # Games: 57 - 28 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Magnificat | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Highland |
Massillon Jackson 5 (17 / 1) - Green 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Massillon Jackson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Green |
Miamisburg 3 (5 / 7) - Northmont 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 46 - 35 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Miamisburg | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Northmont |
New Albany 5 (13 / 3) - Pickerington North 0 (3 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 60 - 17 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
New Albany | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Pickerington North |
Newark 4 (14 / 2) - Reynoldsburg 1 (4 / 13) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 55 - 29 O.o.F.: 5-4-2-1-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Newark | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Reynoldsburg |
North Canton Hoover 5 (18 / 4) - Louisville 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
North Canton Hoover | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Louisville |
Notre Dame Academy 3 (13 / 5) - Toledo St. Ursula Academy 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 52 - 45 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Toledo St. Ursula Academy |
Oak Hills 5 (14 / 3) - Middletown 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oak Hills | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Middletown |
Oakwood 5 (12 / 3) - Carlisle 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oakwood | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Carlisle |
Olentangy Berlin 4 (7 / 5) - Marysville 1 (10 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 54 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Marysville |
Olentangy Orange 5 (4 / 8) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 61 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Olentangy Orange | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hilliard Bradley |
Revere 5 (14 / 2) - Mayfield 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Revere | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Mayfield |
Springboro 5 (11 / 5) - Wayne 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 49 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Springboro | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Wayne |
St. Joseph Academy 4 (11 / 8) - Beaumont 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 64 - 45 O.o.F.: 4-3-2-5-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Beaumont |
St. Ursula Academy 5 (11 / 4) - Seton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Seton |
Sycamore 5 (19 / 2) - Fairfield 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Sycamore | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Fairfield |
Tippecanoe 5 (11 / 5) - Butler 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Tippecanoe | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Butler |
Troy 4 (16 / 3) - Piqua 1 (0 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 48 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Troy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Piqua |
Upper Arlington 3 (12 / 1) - Dublin Coffman 2 (8 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 50 - 32 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Upper Arlington | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dublin Coffman |
Valley View 3 - Brookville 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 50 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Valley View | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Brookville |
Westerville Central 5 (11 / 3) - Central Crossing 0 (1 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Westerville Central | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Central Crossing |
Westerville South 3 (1 / 9) - Franklin Heights 2 (4 / 10) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 39 - 24 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Westerville South | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Franklin Heights |
Wooster 3 (6 / 7) - Dover 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 63% # Games: 52 - 30 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Wooster | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dover |
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (13 / 2) - Westerville North 0 (6 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 64 - 21 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westerville North |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: