Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Avon 3 (12 / 1) - Padua 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 50 - 43 O.o.F.: 5-1-2-3-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Avon | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Padua |
Beavercreek 4 - Archbishop Alter 1 (3 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 52 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Beavercreek | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Archbishop Alter |
Brookville 3 - Piqua 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 62 - 57 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Brookville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Piqua |
Canal Winchester 5 (7 / 6) - Franklin Heights 0 (3 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Canal Winchester | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Franklin Heights |
Columbus Academy 5 (11 / 1) - Bexley 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 84% # Games: 61 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Columbus Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Bexley |
Dublin Coffman 5 (6 / 4) - Dublin Scioto 0 (4 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 O.o.F.: 3-1-4-2-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Dublin Coffman | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dublin Scioto |
Eaton 3 (9 / 2) - Bellbrook 2 (9 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 50% # Games: 57 - 58 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Eaton | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Bellbrook |
Franklin 5 (6 / 4) - Greeneview 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Franklin | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Greeneview |
Gilmour Academy 3 (5 / 1) - Canfield 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 65% # Games: 54 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Gilmour Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Canfield |
Hathaway Brown 4 (5 / 2) - Magnificat 1 (7 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 57 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hathaway Brown | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Magnificat |
Hilliard Darby 3 (5 / 4) - Jonathan Alder 2 (3 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 56 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Hilliard Darby | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Jonathan Alder |
Kettering Fairmont 4 (3 / 9) - West Carrollton 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 81% # Games: 51 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
West Carrollton |
Lehman Catholic 3 (4 / 5) - Milton-Union 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 44% # Games: 41 - 53 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Lehman Catholic | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Milton-Union |
London 3 (3 / 6) - Kenton Ridge 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 52 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
London | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Kenton Ridge |
Madison 4 (2 / 0) - Lakeside 1 (3 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 56 - 24 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Madison | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lakeside |
Marysville 5 (7 / 5) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Marysville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westerville South |
Mason-B 4 - Loveland 1 (7 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 56 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Mason-B | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Loveland |
Massillon Jackson 5 (15 / 0) - Canton McKinley 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Massillon Jackson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Canton McKinley |
New Albany 5 (9 / 2) - Olentangy 0 (1 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 72% # Games: 60 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
New Albany | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Olentangy |
North Canton Hoover 4 (13 / 3) - Massillon Perry 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 61 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
North Canton Hoover | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Massillon Perry |
Northmont 3 - Sidney 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 54 - 52 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Northmont | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Sidney |
Notre Dame Academy 5 (8 / 5) - Sylvania Northview 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Sylvania Northview |
Oakwood 5 (8 / 3) - Tippecanoe 0 (8 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 60 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oakwood | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Tippecanoe |
Orange 4 (10 / 1) - Beachwood 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 56 - 31 O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Orange | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Beachwood |
St. Joseph Academy 4 (8 / 6) - Elyria Catholic 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 53 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Elyria Catholic |
Sycamore 4 (17 / 0) - Centerville 1 (10 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 53 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Sycamore | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Centerville |
Watkins Memorial 3 (5 / 2) - Olentangy Orange 2 (3 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 41 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Watkins Memorial | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Olentangy Orange |
Wellington 4 (1 / 2) - Dublin Jerome 1 (4 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 56% # Games: 49 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Wellington | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Dublin Jerome |
Western Reserve Academy 5 (6 / 0) - Mayfield 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Mayfield |
Whetstone 4 (5 / 2) - Centennial 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 43 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Whetstone | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Centennial |
Worthington Kilbourne 4 (10 / 1) - Gahanna 1 (10 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 56 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Gahanna |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: