Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbus Academy 5 (9 / 8) - Centennial 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Centennial | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (12 / 1) - Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 47 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin | |||||
| Dayton Christian 5 - Beavercreek-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 61 - 18 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dayton Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beavercreek-B | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 5 (8 / 6) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (3 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 60 - 13 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Greenville 3 - Chaminade-Julienne 2 (5 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 66 - 59 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Greenville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Grove City 4 (8 / 3) - Hilliard Davidson 1 (5 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 58 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grove City | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Hilliard Darby 4 (2 / 9) - Westland 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 57 - 21 O.o.F.: 5-1-3-2-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Lancaster 5 (11 / 4) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bloom-Carroll | |||||
| Loveland 3 (15 / 2) - Lakota West 2 (1 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 47 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lakota West | |||||
| Newark 5 (9 / 5) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 O.o.F.: 3-2-1-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Oakwood 5 (11 / 4) - Valley View 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 60 - 18 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Oakwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Valley View | |||||
| Olentangy 3 (8 / 2) - Bexley 2 (8 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 52 - 44 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bexley | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 4 (10 / 2) - DeSales 1 (6 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 60 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Pickerington Central 3 (16 / 2) - Big Walnut 2 (12 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 42 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Sidney 3 - Lehman Catholic 2 (2 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 51 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sidney | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lehman Catholic | |||||
| University School 4 (10 / 1) - North Canton Hoover 1 (13 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 54 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
University School | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Watkins Memorial 4 (11 / 4) - Westerville Central 1 (4 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 81% # Games: 54 - 13 O.o.F.: 4-3-5-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Whetstone 5 (7 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 0 (3 / 9) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 48 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Whetstone | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Wooster 5 (14 / 4) - Central Christian 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Christian | |||||
| Worthington Christian 4 (10 / 5) - Westerville South 1 (1 / 12) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 52 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:









































