Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Anderson 5 (12 / 1) - West Clermont 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 48 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Anderson | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
West Clermont |
Beavercreek 4 (7 / 3) - Miamisburg 1 (6 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 58 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Beavercreek | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Miamisburg |
Bellefontaine 3 (10 / 3) - Urbana 2 (6 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 48 - 31 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Bellefontaine | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Urbana |
Bexley 5 (9 / 3) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 O.o.F.: 5-3-4-2-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Bexley | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Buckeye Valley |
Bloom-Carroll 3 (7 / 2) - Teays Valley 2 (0 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 50 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Bloom-Carroll | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Teays Valley |
Carlisle 4 - Trotwood-Madison 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 58 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Carlisle | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Trotwood-Madison |
Centerville 5 (6 / 3) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (2 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Centerville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Kettering Fairmont |
Chaminade-Julienne 5 (10 / 4) - Fenwick 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 68% # Games: 60 - 28 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Fenwick |
Colerain 4 (1 / 4) - Lakota West 1 (4 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 55 - 21 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Colerain | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lakota West |
DeSales 4 (2 / 5) - Centennial 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 56 - 39 O.o.F.: 4-2-1-5-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
DeSales | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Centennial |
Dublin Coffman 5 (1 / 3) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Dublin Coffman | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hilliard Davidson |
Gahanna 5 (5 / 1) - Westerville Central 0 (2 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 61 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Gahanna | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Westerville Central |
Grandview 5 (7 / 1) - Whitehall 0 (1 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Grandview | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Whitehall |
Greenville 5 - Piqua 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Greenville | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Piqua |
Jonathan Alder 5 (9 / 0) - Kenton Ridge 0 (1 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Jonathan Alder | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Kenton Ridge |
Lakota East 5 (6 / 3) - Princeton 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Lakota East | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Princeton |
Little Miami 5 (5 / 2) - Lebanon 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Little Miami | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lebanon |
Mason 5 (10 / 1) - Hamilton 0 (2 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Mason | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hamilton |
New Albany 3 (3 / 2) - Columbus Academy 2 (5 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 68% # Games: 54 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
New Albany | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Columbus Academy |
Oak Hills 4 (9 / 5) - Middletown 1 (6 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 79% # Games: 57 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oak Hills | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Middletown |
Oakwood 5 (4 / 2) - Monroe 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 51 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Oakwood | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Monroe |
Olentangy 5 (7 / 0) - Hilliard Darby 0 (2 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Olentangy | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Hilliard Darby |
Olentangy Orange 3 (6 / 0) - Upper Arlington 2 (3 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 40 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Olentangy Orange | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Upper Arlington |
Orange 5 (6 / 0) - Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 64 - 19 O.o.F.: 1-4-2-5-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Orange | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy |
Pickerington North 4 (4 / 2) - Grove City 1 (5 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 54 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Pickerington North | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Grove City |
Ready 5 (2 / 4) - New Hope Christian 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 59 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Ready | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
New Hope Christian |
Reynoldsburg 3 (6 / 2) - Lancaster 2 (7 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 59 - 49 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Reynoldsburg | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Lancaster |
Seven Hills 5 (11 / 0) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 O.o.F.: 2-1-3-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Seven Hills | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy |
Seven Hills-B 5 - McNicholas 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Seven Hills-B | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
McNicholas |
St. Xavier 5 (7 / 1) - Moeller 0 (4 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
St. Xavier | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Moeller |
Summit Country Day 4 (2 / 3) - Cincinnati Country Day 1 (2 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 44 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Summit Country Day | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Cincinnati Country Day |
Sycamore 5 (11 / 0) - Fairfield 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Sycamore | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Fairfield |
Thomas Worthington 4 (2 / 2) - Marysville 1 (1 / 10) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 50 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Thomas Worthington | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Marysville |
University School 5 (3 / 0) - St. Ignatius 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 64 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
University School | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
St. Ignatius |
Walsh Jesuit 4 (7 / 0) - Highland 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 29 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Walsh Jesuit | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Highland |
Westerville North 3 (2 / 0) - Big Walnut 2 (6 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 41 - 36 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
![]() |
Westerville North | |||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
![]() |
Big Walnut |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: