Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beavercreek 4 (14 / 6) - Archbishop Alter 1 (5 / 11) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 78% # Games: 52 - 15 O.o.F.: 5-4-2-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Archbishop Alter | |||||
| Bexley 4 (9 / 10) - Wellington 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 60 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wellington | |||||
| Centerville 4 (16 / 2) - Springboro 1 (8 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 53% # Games: 60 - 54 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springboro | |||||
| Centerville-B 3 (10 / 3) - Milton-Union 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 48 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Milton-Union | |||||
| Copley 3 (5 / 3) - Green 2 (0 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 48 - 47 O.o.F.: 1-4-2-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Copley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Green | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 5 (11 / 6) - Whetstone 0 (7 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 61 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whetstone | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 4 (6 / 5) - Olentangy Berlin 1 (11 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 63 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Grandview 3 (9 / 4) - Canal Winchester 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 63% # Games: 55 - 33 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Granville 5 (4 / 0) - Thomas Worthington 0 (6 / 10) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 33 - 6 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Granville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Indian Hill 5 (13 / 2) - Seven Hills 0 (10 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 61 - 10 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Jonathan Alder 4 (9 / 7) - Buckeye Valley 1 (3 / 11) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 51 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Lancaster 4 (12 / 5) - Logan Elm 1 (1 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 58 - 38 O.o.F.: 4-3-1-5-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Logan Elm | |||||
| Lehman Catholic 5 (4 / 8) - Northridge 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: # Games: 0 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lehman Catholic | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Northridge | |||||
| New Albany 3 (13 / 2) - Columbus Academy 2 (9 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 49 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Olentangy Liberty 3 (4 / 6) - Olentangy 2 (8 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 61 - 50 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Liberty | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Ready 4 (7 / 9) - Franklin Heights 1 (0 / 15) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 48 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ready | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Watkins Memorial 5 (12 / 5) - Teays Valley 0 (4 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 O.o.F.: 4-3-2-1-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Teays Valley | |||||
| Westerville Central 3 (6 / 9) - St. Charles 2 (4 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 52 - 50 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Charles | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (12 / 5) - Hilliard Darby 0 (3 / 10) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 64% # Games: 64 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:










































