Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Beavercreek 5 (10 / 3) - Miamisburg 0 (3 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beavercreek | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Miamisburg |
Bellefontaine 4 (12 / 5) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 76% # Games: 57 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellefontaine | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kenton Ridge |
Big Walnut 5 (12 / 5) - Canal Winchester 0 (3 / 12) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 59 - 22 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Big Walnut | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Canal Winchester |
Centerville 5 (10 / 5) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (6 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Centerville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kettering Fairmont |
Chaminade-Julienne 4 (12 / 5) - Archbishop Alter 1 (4 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 61% # Games: 45 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Chaminade-Julienne | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Archbishop Alter |
Chillicothe 3 (13 / 3) - Washington CH 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 65 - 61 O.o.F.: 1-3-5-4-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Chillicothe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Washington CH |
Columbus Academy 5 (15 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Columbus Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Buckeye Valley |
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Franklin Heights 0 (10 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 60 - 21 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Delaware Hayes | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Franklin Heights |
Dublin Coffman 5 (9 / 6) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Coffman | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Bradley |
Dublin Jerome 5 (8 / 7) - Hilliard Darby 0 (3 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 61 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Jerome | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Darby |
Grove City 5 (5 / 7) - Westland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Grove City | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westland |
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - Northwestern 2 (9 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 39 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jonathan Alder | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northwestern |
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - London 2 (7 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 51 - 37 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jonathan Alder | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
London |
Kettering Fairmont 5 (6 / 4) - Carroll 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Kettering Fairmont | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Carroll |
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lakota East | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Princeton |
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - Ashland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lexington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Ashland |
Loveland 4 (9 / 9) - Turpin 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 56 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Loveland | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Turpin |
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Westerville Central 0 (9 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
New Albany | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville Central |
Olentangy Berlin 5 (7 / 6) - Thomas Worthington 0 (2 / 17) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 60 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Berlin | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Thomas Worthington |
Pickerington Central 5 (6 / 4) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 10) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Pickerington Central | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Reynoldsburg |
Pickerington North 3 (5 / 3) - Gahanna 2 (13 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 41 - 44 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Pickerington North | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Gahanna |
Springboro 5 (12 / 4) - Northmont 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Springboro | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northmont |
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Fairfield 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Sycamore | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Fairfield |
Upper Arlington 4 (7 / 9) - Hilliard Davidson 1 (9 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 53 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Upper Arlington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Davidson |
Valley View 5 - Northeastern 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 89% # Games: 62 - 8 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northeastern |
Waynesville 3 - Valley View-B 1 | Score: 3-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 45 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Waynesville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Valley View-B |
Westerville North 3 (7 / 8) - Dublin Scioto 1 (2 / 13) | Score: 3-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 37 - 15 O.o.F.: 4-3-1-2-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Westerville North | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Scioto |
Whetstone 5 (2 / 3) - Beechcroft 0 (6 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Whetstone | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Beechcroft |
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - New Philadelphia 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Wooster | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
New Philadelphia |
Worthington Kilbourne 4 (7 / 8) - Westerville South 1 (4 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 60 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Worthington Kilbourne | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville South |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: