Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Monday, April 22 (click for: May 17 May 15 May 13 May 10 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 4 (13 / 2) - Avon Lake 1 (0 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 86%
  • 45%
  • 55%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 67 - 41
O.o.F.: 1-3-2-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Avon Lake   
Badin 4 (2 / 2) - Centerville-B 1 (9 / 4)
  • 71%
  • 58%
  • 71%
  • 52%
  • 0%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 54%
# Games: 57 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Badin
Results (Winning %)
Centerville-B   
Beavercreek 4 (10 / 3) - Cincinnati Country Day 1 (1 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 43%
  • 65%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 59 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Cincinnati Country Day   
Bellbrook 3 (4 / 6) - Monroe 2
  • 100%
  • 8%
  • 100%
  • 48%
  • 48%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 49 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Monroe   
Big Walnut 4 (12 / 5) - Marion Harding 1 (0 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 42%
  • 60%
  • 75%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 58 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Marion Harding   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (13 / 2) - St. Vincent-St. Mary 1 (0 / 3)
  • 46%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 74%
# Games: 59 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
St. Vincent-St. Mary   
Dayton Christian 5 - Middletown Christian 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Middletown Christian   
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Pleasant 0
  • 75%
  • 53%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 57 - 16
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Pleasant   
DeSales 4 (15 / 2) - Pickerington North 1 (5 / 3)
  • 75%
  • 43%
  • 60%
  • 100%
  • 68%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 59 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington North   
Eaton 4 - Waynesville 1
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 72%
  • 71%
  • 29%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 54 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Eaton
Results (Winning %)
Waynesville   
Grandview 5 (4 / 4) - Ready 0 (8 / 5)
  • 80%
  • 65%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 65 - 14
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grandview
Results (Winning %)
Ready   
Grove City 3 (5 / 7) - Franklin Heights 2 (10 / 7)
  • 71%
  • 43%
  • 55%
  • 80%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 61 - 50
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - Walsh Jesuit 0 (1 / 6)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 59%
  • 67%
  • 62%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 62 - 26
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hudson
Results (Winning %)
Walsh Jesuit   
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - London 2 (7 / 6)
  • 65%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 29%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 57%
# Games: 54 - 41
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
London   
Lakeside 3 (3 / 13) - Madison 2 (1 / 1)
  • 29%
  • 63%
  • 43%
  • 75%
  • 61%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 58 - 50
O.o.F.: 4-2-1-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakeside
Results (Winning %)
Madison   
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - St. Xavier-B 0
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 63%
  • 50%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 69%
# Games: 56 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
St. Xavier-B   
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - New Philadelphia 0
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 97%
# Games: 60 - 2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
New Philadelphia   
Loveland 4 (9 / 9) - Oak Hills 1 (0 / 4)
  • 33%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 52%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 53 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Oak Hills   
Marysville 4 (9 / 4) - Dublin Scioto 1 (2 / 13)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 38%
  • 45%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 54 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Marysville
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Mason 4 (8 / 6) - Centerville 1 (10 / 5)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 55%
  • 64%
  • 50%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 68 - 39
O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Centerville   
Massillon Jackson 5 (16 / 4) - Canton McKinley 0
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Canton McKinley   
Miami Valley School 5 (4 / 3) - Yellow Springs 0
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 60%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miami Valley School
Results (Winning %)
Yellow Springs   
Miamisburg 3 (3 / 6) - Butler 2
  • 75%
  • 52%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 48%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 65%
# Games: 58 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miamisburg
Results (Winning %)
Butler   
Oakwood 5 (14 / 2) - Chaminade-Julienne 0 (12 / 5)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 63%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 77%
# Games: 48 - 14
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Chaminade-Julienne   
Olentangy 5 (7 / 6) - St. Charles 0 (7 / 7)
  • 65%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 59%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 62 - 25
O.o.F.: 2-3-4-1-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy
Results (Winning %)
St. Charles   
Olentangy Berlin 4 (7 / 6) - Westerville South 1 (4 / 9)
  • 25%
  • 61%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 51 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Olentangy Liberty 4 (9 / 5) - Bexley 1 (14 / 9)
  • 30%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 63%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 55 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Liberty
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
Olentangy Orange 4 (12 / 2) - Dublin Coffman 1 (9 / 6)
  • 25%
  • 80%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 52 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Coffman   
Ottawa Hills 4 (11 / 5) - Elida 1
  • 92%
  • 38%
  • 80%
  • 44%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 52 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ottawa Hills
Results (Winning %)
Elida   
Piqua 4 - Lehman Catholic 2 (2 / 5)
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 35%
  • 47%
  • 14%
Score: 4-2
% Games: 50%
# Games: 49 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Piqua
Results (Winning %)
Lehman Catholic   
Seven Hills 4 (14 / 2) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 1 (0 / 5)
  • 100%
  • 53%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 81%
# Games: 46 - 11
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy   
Sidney 5 - Piqua 0
  • 80%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Piqua   
St. Xavier 3 (17 / 4) - Springboro 2 (12 / 4)
  • 53%
  • 67%
  • 41%
  • 62%
  • 40%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 61 - 55
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Xavier
Results (Winning %)
Springboro   
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Princeton   
Teays Valley 5 (3 / 1) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 10)
  • 67%
  • 86%
  • 55%
  • 92%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 65 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Teays Valley
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
Tippecanoe 4 (12 / 5) - Troy 1 (10 / 2)
  • 20%
  • 86%
  • 42%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 47 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Tippecanoe
Results (Winning %)
Troy   
Unioto 3 - Chillicothe 2 (13 / 3)
  • 56%
  • 29%
  • 25%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 47 - 40
O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Unioto
Results (Winning %)
Chillicothe   
Watkins Memorial 4 (15 / 0) - Pickerington Central 1 (6 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 37%
  • 49%
  • 65%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 55%
# Games: 63 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington Central   
Westerville Central 5 (9 / 5) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville Central
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Westerville North 3 (7 / 8) - Hilliard Darby 2 (3 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 37%
  • 32%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 49 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville North
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Worthington Christian 3 (6 / 12) - Watterson 2 (4 / 5)
  • 0%
  • 67%
  • 65%
  • 67%
  • 33%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 45 - 44
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Watterson   
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (7 / 8) - Canal Winchester 0 (3 / 12)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: