Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Tuesday, April 16 (click for: May 15 May 13 May 10 May 08 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Beachwood 4 (7 / 2) - St. Edward 1 (0 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 29%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 53 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beachwood
Results (Winning %)
St. Edward   
Beechcroft 5 (6 / 5) - Briggs 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 89%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 93%
# Games: 40 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beechcroft
Results (Winning %)
Briggs   
Bellbrook 5 (4 / 6) - Franklin 0
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Franklin   
Bexley 5 (14 / 8) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Big Walnut 3 (12 / 5) - Westerville North 2 (7 / 8)
  • 72%
  • 8%
  • 38%
  • 75%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 46 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Westerville North   
Butler 4 - Sidney 1
  • 59%
  • 67%
  • 20%
  • 50%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 54 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Butler
Results (Winning %)
Sidney   
Chaminade-Julienne 4 (12 / 5) - McNicholas 1 (0 / 3)
  • 35%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 42 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
McNicholas   
Chillicothe 3 (13 / 3) - Athens 2
  • 67%
  • 71%
  • 80%
  • 35%
  • 8%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 44 - 39
O.o.F.: 5-2-1-4-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Athens   
Columbus Academy 5 (14 / 4) - Ready 0 (8 / 5)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Ready   
Copley 4 (6 / 7) - Kent Roosevelt 1 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 45%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 83%
# Games: 58 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Copley
Results (Winning %)
Kent Roosevelt   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (13 / 2) - Gilmour Academy 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 67%
  • 71%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 60 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Gilmour Academy   
Dayton Christian 3 - Milton-Union 2
  • 46%
  • 14%
  • 55%
  • 92%
  • 80%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 54 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Milton-Union   
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Dublin Scioto 0 (2 / 13)
  • 67%
  • 57%
  • 71%
  • 54%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 64%
# Games: 63 - 35
O.o.F.: 5-1-3-4-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
DeSales 5 (15 / 2) - Whetstone 0 (2 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 68%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 84%
# Games: 61 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Whetstone   
Dixie 5 - Stivers 0
  • 75%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 60 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dixie
Results (Winning %)
Stivers   
Dublin Coffman 5 (9 / 6) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (9 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 63%
  • 75%
  • 54%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 62 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Davidson   
Dublin Jerome 5 (8 / 7) - Olentangy Berlin 0 (7 / 6)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 56%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 57 - 16
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Berlin   
Edgewood Ashtabula 5 - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 63%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 60 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Edgewood Ashtabula
Results (Winning %)
Lakeside   
Gahanna 3 (13 / 3) - Westerville Central 2 (9 / 5)
  • 33%
  • 43%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 59%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 57%
# Games: 57 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Grandview 4 (4 / 4) - Worthington Christian 1 (6 / 12)
  • 68%
  • 25%
  • 57%
  • 60%
  • 65%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 61 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grandview
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Christian   
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - Solon 0 (6 / 6)
  • 71%
  • 67%
  • 57%
  • 56%
  • 58%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 60%
# Games: 70 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hudson
Results (Winning %)
Solon   
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - Bellefontaine 2 (12 / 5)
  • 63%
  • 33%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 46%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 54 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
Bellefontaine   
Lake-Uniontown 5 - Archbishop Hoban 0
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lake-Uniontown
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Hoban   
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 67%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 84%
# Games: 48 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Hamilton   
Lancaster 4 (2 / 3) - Reynoldsburg 1 (1 / 10)
  • 20%
  • 71%
  • 50%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 49 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lancaster
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - Wooster 0 (13 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 79%
# Games: 60 - 16
O.o.F.: 3-4-2-1-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
Wooster   
London 4 (7 / 6) - Shawnee 1
  • 86%
  • 25%
  • 72%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 53 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
London
Results (Winning %)
Shawnee   
Loveland 5 (9 / 9) - Lebanon 0
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Lebanon   
Marysville 4 (9 / 4) - Thomas Worthington 1 (2 / 17)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 29%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 47 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Marysville
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Mason 5 (8 / 6) - Lakota West 0 (1 / 3)
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 60 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Lakota West   
Massillon Jackson 5 (16 / 4) - Revere 0 (2 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 68%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 61 - 22
O.o.F.: 1-4-5-2-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Revere   
Miamisburg 5 (3 / 6) - Wilmington 0 (0 / 2)
  • 56%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 58 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miamisburg
Results (Winning %)
Wilmington   
Newark 5 (8 / 3) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 63%
  • 63%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 60 - 22
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Northwestern 5 (9 / 5) - Tecumseh 0 (0 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Tecumseh   
Oakwood 5 (14 / 2) - Eaton 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Eaton   
Olentangy 5 (7 / 6) - Hilliard Darby 0 (3 / 8)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 75%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Olentangy Liberty 5 (9 / 5) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Liberty
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Bradley   
Olentangy Orange 4 (12 / 2) - Upper Arlington 1 (7 / 9)
  • 72%
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 29%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 54 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Upper Arlington   
Perrysburg 3 (9 / 0) - Findlay 2 (0 / 2)
  • 25%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 37%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 47 - 34
O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Findlay   
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Summit Country Day 0 (0 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
O.o.F.: 4-5-2-3-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Summit Country Day   
Springboro 3 (12 / 4) - Springfield 0
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 3-0
% Games: 97%
# Games: 36 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Springfield   
St. Xavier 4 (17 / 4) - Moeller 1 (1 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 14%
  • 52%
  • 63%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 53 - 35
O.o.F.: 1-2-5-4-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Xavier
Results (Winning %)
Moeller   
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Lakota East 0 (10 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Lakota East   
Teays Valley 5 (3 / 1) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (2 / 6)
  • 67%
  • 65%
  • 63%
  • 68%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 67%
# Games: 62 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Teays Valley
Results (Winning %)
Bloom-Carroll   
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Piqua 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Tippecanoe
Results (Winning %)
Piqua   
Trotwood-Madison 5 - Valley View-B 0
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 63%
  • 46%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 67%
# Games: 60 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Trotwood-Madison
Results (Winning %)
Valley View-B   
Troy 5 (10 / 2) - West Carrollton 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 36 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
West Carrollton   
Upper Arlington-B 3 (1 / 1) - St. Charles 2 (7 / 7)
  • 29%
  • 38%
  • 75%
  • 52%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 54 - 51
O.o.F.: 1-3-5-2-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington-B
Results (Winning %)
St. Charles   
Valley View 3 - Carlisle 2
  • 0%
  • 71%
  • 42%
  • 92%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 52 - 41
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
Carlisle   
Westerville South 4 (4 / 9) - Canal Winchester 1 (3 / 12)
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 29%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 53 - 24
O.o.F.: 1-5-3-4-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville South
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (7 / 8) - Franklin Heights 0 (10 / 7)
  • 63%
  • 63%
  • 71%
  • 65%
  • 62%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 65%
# Games: 62 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: