Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Beachwood 4 (7 / 2) - St. Edward 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 53 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beachwood | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
St. Edward |
Beechcroft 5 (6 / 5) - Briggs 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 93% # Games: 40 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beechcroft | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Briggs |
Bellbrook 5 (4 / 6) - Franklin 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellbrook | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Franklin |
Bexley 5 (14 / 8) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bexley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Buckeye Valley |
Big Walnut 3 (12 / 5) - Westerville North 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 46 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Big Walnut | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville North |
Butler 4 - Sidney 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 56% # Games: 54 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Butler | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Sidney |
Chaminade-Julienne 4 (12 / 5) - McNicholas 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 42 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Chaminade-Julienne | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
McNicholas |
Chillicothe 3 (13 / 3) - Athens 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 44 - 39 O.o.F.: 5-2-1-4-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Chillicothe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Athens |
Columbus Academy 5 (14 / 4) - Ready 0 (8 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Columbus Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Ready |
Copley 4 (6 / 7) - Kent Roosevelt 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 83% # Games: 58 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Copley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kent Roosevelt |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (13 / 2) - Gilmour Academy 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Gilmour Academy |
Dayton Christian 3 - Milton-Union 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 54 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dayton Christian | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Milton-Union |
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Dublin Scioto 0 (2 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 64% # Games: 63 - 35 O.o.F.: 5-1-3-4-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Delaware Hayes | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Scioto |
DeSales 5 (15 / 2) - Whetstone 0 (2 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 84% # Games: 61 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
DeSales | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Whetstone |
Dixie 5 - Stivers 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dixie | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Stivers |
Dublin Coffman 5 (9 / 6) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (9 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 62 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Coffman | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Davidson |
Dublin Jerome 5 (8 / 7) - Olentangy Berlin 0 (7 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 57 - 16 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Jerome | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Olentangy Berlin |
Edgewood Ashtabula 5 - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 60 - 17 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Edgewood Ashtabula | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakeside |
Gahanna 3 (13 / 3) - Westerville Central 2 (9 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 57 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Gahanna | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville Central |
Grandview 4 (4 / 4) - Worthington Christian 1 (6 / 12) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 57% # Games: 61 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Grandview | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Worthington Christian |
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - Solon 0 (6 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 60% # Games: 70 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hudson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Solon |
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - Bellefontaine 2 (12 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 54 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jonathan Alder | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Bellefontaine |
Lake-Uniontown 5 - Archbishop Hoban 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lake-Uniontown | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Archbishop Hoban |
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 84% # Games: 48 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lakota East | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hamilton |
Lancaster 4 (2 / 3) - Reynoldsburg 1 (1 / 10) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 49 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lancaster | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Reynoldsburg |
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - Wooster 0 (13 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 O.o.F.: 3-4-2-1-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lexington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wooster |
London 4 (7 / 6) - Shawnee 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 53 - 21 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
London | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Shawnee |
Loveland 5 (9 / 9) - Lebanon 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Loveland | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lebanon |
Marysville 4 (9 / 4) - Thomas Worthington 1 (2 / 17) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 47 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Marysville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Thomas Worthington |
Mason 5 (8 / 6) - Lakota West 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Mason | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakota West |
Massillon Jackson 5 (16 / 4) - Revere 0 (2 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 22 O.o.F.: 1-4-5-2-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Massillon Jackson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Revere |
Miamisburg 5 (3 / 6) - Wilmington 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 58 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Miamisburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wilmington |
Newark 5 (8 / 3) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 60 - 22 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-5-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Newark | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Central Crossing |
Northwestern 5 (9 / 5) - Tecumseh 0 (0 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Northwestern | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Tecumseh |
Oakwood 5 (14 / 2) - Eaton 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Oakwood | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Eaton |
Olentangy 5 (7 / 6) - Hilliard Darby 0 (3 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 60 - 13 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Darby |
Olentangy Liberty 5 (9 / 5) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Liberty | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Bradley |
Olentangy Orange 4 (12 / 2) - Upper Arlington 1 (7 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 54 - 28 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Orange | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Upper Arlington |
Perrysburg 3 (9 / 0) - Findlay 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 47 - 34 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Perrysburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Findlay |
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Summit Country Day 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 O.o.F.: 4-5-2-3-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Seven Hills | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Summit Country Day |
Springboro 3 (12 / 4) - Springfield 0 | Score: 3-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 36 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Springboro | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Springfield |
St. Xavier 4 (17 / 4) - Moeller 1 (1 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 53 - 35 O.o.F.: 1-2-5-4-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
St. Xavier | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Moeller |
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Lakota East 0 (10 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Sycamore | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakota East |
Teays Valley 5 (3 / 1) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (2 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 67% # Games: 62 - 31 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Teays Valley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Bloom-Carroll |
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Piqua 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Tippecanoe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Piqua |
Trotwood-Madison 5 - Valley View-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 67% # Games: 60 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Trotwood-Madison | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Valley View-B |
Troy 5 (10 / 2) - West Carrollton 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 36 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Troy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
West Carrollton |
Upper Arlington-B 3 (1 / 1) - St. Charles 2 (7 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 54 - 51 O.o.F.: 1-3-5-2-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Upper Arlington-B | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
St. Charles |
Valley View 3 - Carlisle 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 52 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Carlisle |
Westerville South 4 (4 / 9) - Canal Winchester 1 (3 / 12) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 53 - 24 O.o.F.: 1-5-3-4-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Westerville South | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Canal Winchester |
Worthington Kilbourne 5 (7 / 8) - Franklin Heights 0 (10 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 65% # Games: 62 - 34 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Worthington Kilbourne | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Franklin Heights |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: