Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Avon 5 (13 / 2) - Midview 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 O.o.F.: 2-1-3-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Avon | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Midview |
Beavercreek 5 (10 / 3) - Bellbrook 0 (4 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beavercreek | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Bellbrook |
Bellefontaine 5 (12 / 5) - Tecumseh 0 (0 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellefontaine | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Tecumseh |
Canal Winchester 5 (3 / 12) - Groveport 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 24 - 5 O.o.F.: 3-2-1-0-0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Canal Winchester | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Groveport |
Columbus Academy 4 (14 / 4) - Wellington 1 (3 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 50 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Columbus Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wellington |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (13 / 2) - Chagrin Falls 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 61 - 13 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chagrin Falls |
Delaware Hayes 4 (12 / 4) - Mount Vernon 1 (0 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 64 - 42 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Delaware Hayes | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Mount Vernon |
DeSales 5 (15 / 2) - Dublin Scioto 0 (2 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 65% # Games: 67 - 36 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
DeSales | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Scioto |
Dixie 5 - Wayne 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 68% # Games: 65 - 31 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dixie | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wayne |
Eaton 5 - West Carrollton 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 48 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Eaton | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
West Carrollton |
Franklin Heights 5 (10 / 7) - Westland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Franklin Heights | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westland |
Geneva 3 (3 / 1) - Beachwood 2 (7 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 43 - 37 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Geneva | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Beachwood |
Granville 5 (4 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (4 / 9) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Granville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville South |
Green 3 (1 / 2) - Lake-Uniontown 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 57 - 42 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Green | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lake-Uniontown |
Grove City 5 (5 / 7) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 59 - 14 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Grove City | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Central Crossing |
Hilliard Davidson 4 (9 / 7) - Westerville Central 1 (9 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 50 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hilliard Davidson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville Central |
Jefferson Area 5 - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 62 - 27 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jefferson Area | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakeside |
Jonathan Alder 4 (16 / 3) - Urbana 1 (0 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 53 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jonathan Alder | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Urbana |
Kettering Fairmont 3 (6 / 4) - Butler 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 54 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Kettering Fairmont | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Butler |
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Miamisburg 0 (3 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lakota East | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Miamisburg |
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - West Holmes 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 O.o.F.: 3-5-1-4-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lexington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
West Holmes |
London 4 (7 / 6) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 74% # Games: 59 - 21 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
London | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kenton Ridge |
Mason 5 (8 / 6) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Mason | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Princeton |
Milton-Union 4 - Valley View 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 67 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Milton-Union | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Valley View |
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Thomas Worthington 0 (2 / 17) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
New Albany | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Thomas Worthington |
Northwestern 5 (9 / 5) - Shawnee 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 60 - 13 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Northwestern | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Shawnee |
Olentangy Berlin 3 (7 / 6) - Watterson 2 (4 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 43 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Berlin | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Watterson |
Olentangy Orange 4 (12 / 2) - Olentangy 1 (7 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 63 - 33 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Orange | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Olentangy |
Ottawa Hills 5 (11 / 5) - Toledo Central Catholic 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 62 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Ottawa Hills | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Toledo Central Catholic |
Perrysburg 4 (9 / 0) - Clay 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 74% # Games: 54 - 19 O.o.F.: 3-5-2-4-1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Perrysburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Clay |
Pickerington Central 3 (6 / 4) - Westerville North 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 57 - 48 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Pickerington Central | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville North |
Piqua 3 - Springfield 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 24 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Piqua | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Springfield |
Revere 5 (2 / 2) - Copley 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Revere | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Copley |
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Anderson 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 61 - 14 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Seven Hills | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Anderson |
Sidney 4 - Lehman Catholic 1 (2 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 57 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Sidney | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lehman Catholic |
St. Marys Memorial 4 - Sidney 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 57 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
St. Marys Memorial | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Sidney |
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Chaminade-Julienne 0 (12 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 61 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Tippecanoe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chaminade-Julienne |
Trotwood-Madison 4 - Stebbins 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 57 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Trotwood-Madison | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Stebbins |
Troy 5 (10 / 2) - Northmont 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 62 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Troy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northmont |
Upper Arlington 4 (7 / 9) - Marysville 1 (9 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 50 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Upper Arlington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Marysville |
Valley View-B 3 - McNicholas 2 (0 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 45 - 36 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View-B | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
McNicholas |
Watkins Memorial 5 (15 / 0) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (2 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Watkins Memorial | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Bloom-Carroll |
Waverly 4 - Chillicothe 0 (13 / 3) | Score: 4-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 57 - 29 O.o.F.: 4-1-5-3-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Waverly | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chillicothe |
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - Madison Comprehensive 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Wooster | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Madison Comprehensive |
Worthington Christian 3 (6 / 12) - Worthington Kilbourne 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 48 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Worthington Christian | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Worthington Kilbourne |
Zanesville 3 - Newark 2 (8 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 57 - 50 O.o.F.: 2-5-1-4-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Zanesville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Newark |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: