Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Monday, April 15 (click for: May 15 May 13 May 10 May 08 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 5 (13 / 2) - Midview 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
O.o.F.: 2-1-3-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Midview   
Beavercreek 5 (10 / 3) - Bellbrook 0 (4 / 6)
  • 71%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 60 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Bellbrook   
Bellefontaine 5 (12 / 5) - Tecumseh 0 (0 / 8)
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellefontaine
Results (Winning %)
Tecumseh   
Canal Winchester 5 (3 / 12) - Groveport 0 (0 / 6)
  • 62%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 24 - 5
O.o.F.: 3-2-1-0-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Canal Winchester
Results (Winning %)
Groveport   
Columbus Academy 4 (14 / 4) - Wellington 1 (3 / 3)
  • 14%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 50 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Wellington   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (13 / 2) - Chagrin Falls 0 (0 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 68%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 61 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Chagrin Falls   
Delaware Hayes 4 (12 / 4) - Mount Vernon 1 (0 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 54%
  • 59%
  • 50%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 64 - 42
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   
DeSales 5 (15 / 2) - Dublin Scioto 0 (2 / 13)
  • 92%
  • 59%
  • 86%
  • 65%
  • 46%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 65%
# Games: 67 - 36
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Dixie 5 - Wayne 0
  • 75%
  • 71%
  • 75%
  • 57%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 68%
# Games: 65 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dixie
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
Eaton 5 - West Carrollton 0
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 48 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Eaton
Results (Winning %)
West Carrollton   
Franklin Heights 5 (10 / 7) - Westland 0
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Franklin Heights
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Geneva 3 (3 / 1) - Beachwood 2 (7 / 2)
  • 8%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 33%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 43 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Geneva
Results (Winning %)
Beachwood   
Granville 5 (4 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (4 / 9)
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Granville
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Green 3 (1 / 2) - Lake-Uniontown 2
  • 50%
  • 62%
  • 100%
  • 35%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 57 - 42
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Green
Results (Winning %)
Lake-Uniontown   
Grove City 5 (5 / 7) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 91%
  • 59%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 81%
# Games: 59 - 14
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Hilliard Davidson 4 (9 / 7) - Westerville Central 1 (9 / 5)
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 62%
  • 8%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 50 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Davidson
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Jefferson Area 5 - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 68%
  • 59%
  • 52%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 62 - 27
O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jefferson Area
Results (Winning %)
Lakeside   
Jonathan Alder 4 (16 / 3) - Urbana 1 (0 / 5)
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 29%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 73%
# Games: 53 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
Urbana   
Kettering Fairmont 3 (6 / 4) - Butler 2
  • 29%
  • 60%
  • 63%
  • 75%
  • 40%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 54 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Butler   
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Miamisburg 0 (3 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - West Holmes 0
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
O.o.F.: 3-5-1-4-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
West Holmes   
London 4 (7 / 6) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 8)
  • 44%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 74%
# Games: 59 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
London
Results (Winning %)
Kenton Ridge   
Mason 5 (8 / 6) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Princeton   
Milton-Union 4 - Valley View 1
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 56%
  • 42%
  • 63%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 67 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Milton-Union
Results (Winning %)
Valley View   
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Thomas Worthington 0 (2 / 17)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Northwestern 5 (9 / 5) - Shawnee 0
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Shawnee   
Olentangy Berlin 3 (7 / 6) - Watterson 2 (4 / 5)
  • 14%
  • 92%
  • 62%
  • 25%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 43 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Watterson   
Olentangy Orange 4 (12 / 2) - Olentangy 1 (7 / 6)
  • 71%
  • 44%
  • 80%
  • 70%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 63 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy   
Ottawa Hills 5 (11 / 5) - Toledo Central Catholic 0 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 54%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 77%
# Games: 62 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ottawa Hills
Results (Winning %)
Toledo Central Catholic   
Perrysburg 4 (9 / 0) - Clay 1
  • 32%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 74%
# Games: 54 - 19
O.o.F.: 3-5-2-4-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Clay   
Pickerington Central 3 (6 / 4) - Westerville North 2 (7 / 8)
  • 55%
  • 25%
  • 46%
  • 67%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 57 - 48
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Westerville North   
Piqua 3 - Springfield 2
  • 8%
  • 92%
  • 46%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 48%
# Games: 24 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Piqua
Results (Winning %)
Springfield   
Revere 5 (2 / 2) - Copley 0 (6 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 75%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 60 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Revere
Results (Winning %)
Copley   
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Anderson 0 (1 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 59%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 81%
# Games: 61 - 14
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Anderson   
Sidney 4 - Lehman Catholic 1 (2 / 5)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 41%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 57 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Lehman Catholic   
St. Marys Memorial 4 - Sidney 1
  • 72%
  • 92%
  • 39%
  • 68%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 57 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Marys Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Sidney   
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Chaminade-Julienne 0 (12 / 5)
  • 92%
  • 65%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 75%
# Games: 61 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Tippecanoe
Results (Winning %)
Chaminade-Julienne   
Trotwood-Madison 4 - Stebbins 1
  • 59%
  • 80%
  • 25%
  • 67%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 57 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Trotwood-Madison
Results (Winning %)
Stebbins   
Troy 5 (10 / 2) - Northmont 0
  • 65%
  • 72%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 62 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Upper Arlington 4 (7 / 9) - Marysville 1 (9 / 4)
  • 14%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 50 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Marysville   
Valley View-B 3 - McNicholas 2 (0 / 3)
  • 8%
  • 41%
  • 75%
  • 65%
  • 80%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 45 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View-B
Results (Winning %)
McNicholas   
Watkins Memorial 5 (15 / 0) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (2 / 6)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Bloom-Carroll   
Waverly 4 - Chillicothe 0 (13 / 3)
  • 59%
  • 57%
  • 75%
  • 92%
Score: 4-0
% Games: 66%
# Games: 57 - 29
O.o.F.: 4-1-5-3-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Waverly
Results (Winning %)
Chillicothe   
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - Madison Comprehensive 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
Madison Comprehensive   
Worthington Christian 3 (6 / 12) - Worthington Kilbourne 2 (7 / 8)
  • 76%
  • 80%
  • 37%
  • 60%
  • 25%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 48 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Kilbourne   
Zanesville 3 - Newark 2 (8 / 3)
  • 38%
  • 80%
  • 52%
  • 41%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 57 - 50
O.o.F.: 2-5-1-4-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Zanesville
Results (Winning %)
Newark   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: